I'm really a bit pissed at the moment. I was intending to post something (not naval or wargame related) on my academia.edu page only to find the mini-blog and its content have disappeared. I hope this is only temporary (they seem to have lost some of my papers as well, I suspect that is not deliberate since there was nothing controversial in those, unlike the blog ;( If this is not sorted in the next few days that account will be deleted.
Something similar appears to have happened to my wordpress blog...grrr... I can't delete this account as its content already appears to have been purged. - maybe only on work computers, seems OK from home.
Just goes to show you cannot trust any third party on the internet to host your stuff. Not sure I can rely on blogger to not purge me so will have to look into some other solution - probably just taking all my material off of the internet and keeping it in big manuscript ledgers.
Monday, 28 September 2015
Saturday, 1 August 2015
Irony?
Box of Matches, Purchased in Portsmouth |
"England's Glory", made in Sweden ...
Monday, 20 April 2015
It always aggravates/amuses/annoys me to read technical journals where claims are made that are not true. Not only not true but well known to be not true within the community concerned.
The latest example of ignorance of this sort that I have come accross (it dates from 2006, so not that recent, except to me) is in this article in Undersea Warfare, The Official Magazine of the US Submarine Force (maybe it should be considered for publication of the week on Have I Got News For You). There it is asserted that the sinking of the Belgrano by Conqueror in 1982 was the first torpedo fired in anger against a warship since 1945. The problem with this is that Pakistan Navy Daphné-class submarine Hangor, on 9 December 1971, fired three torpedoes (probably French L5's) at the ships of the Indian Navy's 14th Frigate Squadron sinking the Khukri (a type 14 frigate).
The further significance of the Hangor/14th Frigate Squadron incident is that it is the first, and so far only, known use in anger of homing torpedoes post WW2.
The latest example of ignorance of this sort that I have come accross (it dates from 2006, so not that recent, except to me) is in this article in Undersea Warfare, The Official Magazine of the US Submarine Force (maybe it should be considered for publication of the week on Have I Got News For You). There it is asserted that the sinking of the Belgrano by Conqueror in 1982 was the first torpedo fired in anger against a warship since 1945. The problem with this is that Pakistan Navy Daphné-class submarine Hangor, on 9 December 1971, fired three torpedoes (probably French L5's) at the ships of the Indian Navy's 14th Frigate Squadron sinking the Khukri (a type 14 frigate).
The further significance of the Hangor/14th Frigate Squadron incident is that it is the first, and so far only, known use in anger of homing torpedoes post WW2.
Wednesday, 18 February 2015
Midway Article in Spring 2015 issue of Naval War College Review
There is an interesting paper on Nagumo's intelligence estimates at Midway by Antony Tully and Lu Yu and its impact on the battle. It can be found here: Midway Paper
Sunday, 18 January 2015
Guerre de Course
Introduction
In a recent post on the History Stack Exchange a question was asked which may be paraphrased as
Why
were cruisers (in the pre-missile age) used for anything other than
commerce raiding.
I
provided an answer there where I used the term Guerre
de Course and
added after its first use the parenthetical suggestion that the
reader should Google the term. Now along comes someone with
sufficient privilege to edit my post and removes my parenthetical
remark and makes Guerre
de Course itself
into a link to the Wikipedia page on Commerce
Raiding. What I take exception to is that if I wanted to provide
a link I would have done so, Why did I not do so? Because I want to
encourage readers to do at least some of the work themselves, and
learn to do research, after all it is not difficult in the age of the
interwebs. Well I am disinclined to remove the edit, but the affair
has prompted me to write something anout the topic here, and if I
like what I write perhaps to publish it elsewhere.
Definition and Etymology
I
expect that most readers know that Guerre
de Course is
a French term meaning a naval war or campaign
against merchant shipping or trade. Now Wikipedia and other
sources rather than give a proper etymology of the expression just
tell us that it is translated literally as "war of race"
or something equivalent and uninformative.
Now
what I observe is that a better translation would be "war of the
corsairs". Where corsair is
a term meaning pirate or a pirate ship (often specifically
a Barbary Pirate).
This of course now explains the meaning of the term Guerre
de Course = War of Piracy which
is descriptive of the actual practice (with only a modicum
of hyperbole as pre-20th Century it was often conducted
with/by Privateers -
you may note that on that link a privateer is also described as
a corsair).
We
might also note in passing that the word Course
is derived from the Latin cursus
which among its other meanings has run rather than chase. Which
reminds me of the Byzantine warship type: Dromon
(from Greek for running). While the ships used by the Barbary Pirates
may not them selves have been descended from the Dromon at least the
Latinate term to describe them may well be. Doing an image search however does indicate a possible evolutionary connection between the galleys used by the Barbary pirates and the dromon.
Reconstruction of an early 10thcentury Byzantine bireme dromon, based on the Tactica of Emperor Leo VI the Wise. |
Illustration of a galley running before the wind, found in The Story of the Barbary Corsairs' by Stanley Lane-Poole, published in 1890 by G.P. Putnam's Sons. |
More to Follow ... ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)